How Many Animals Are Used For Animal Testing Medical
What have humans gained from animal testing? Are we getting closer to finding a cure for HIV, cancer, and other diseases through animal experiments? These eleven animal testing statistics will help you lot understand how creature experiments (don't) work and what nosotros're (not) getting out of them.
i. Each year, more 110 million animals—including mice, frogs, dogs, rabbits, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories.
Experimenters force animals to inhale toxic fumes, immobilize them in restraint devices, drill holes into their skulls, mutilate their brains, and burn their skin and eyes—and if the animals don't dice in the process, they're killed afterward. Whether information technology'southward for biology lessons, medical preparation, marvel-driven experiments, or chemical, drug, food, or cosmetics testing, these animals are confined to barren cages, socially isolated, and psychologically traumatized.
Covance Cruelty
2. Ninety-five percent of all drugs that are shown to be rubber and effective in animal tests neglect in man trials.
This stat comes directly from the National Institutes of Wellness (NIH)—the authorities agency that funnels billions of our taxpayer dollars into these reckless experiments. NIH has noted that the drugs neglect in humans because they either don't piece of work or are unsafe. Because brute trials are and then unreliable, they make homo ones more risky.
iii. Xc-nine pct of the animals used in laboratories aren't covered by federal beast protection laws.
It's as if the government were maxim, "I'm sorry, but y'all're just not animal enough" to the tens of millions of rats, mice, birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians who constitute 99% of the animals used in laboratories nevertheless are excluded by the federal Animal Welfare Deed (AWA) and therefore denied even the nigh basic consideration. All the same, even animals who are supposedly "protected" under the AWA are still allowed to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, restrained, made addicted to drugs, and encephalon-damaged. No exam—no matter how painful or piddling—is illegal. And pain relief isn't required.
© Doctors Against Animal Experiments
iv. Between 2015 and 2019, more than 300,000 animals covered nether the AWA were subjected to painful experiments without pain relief.
Rabbits haven't received any pain relief in the Draize eye and peel irritation and corrosion tests since they started in the 1940s. In these tests, a substance is dripped into rabbits' eyes or smeared onto their shaved skin, leaving them to suffer from inflammation, ulcers, bleeding, irritated and cloudy optics, blindness, redness, swelling, discharge, and hemorrhaging.
5. A 2009 survey found that mice and rats used in invasive, painful surgeries were only provided with mail-operative pain relief about 20% of the fourth dimension.
The survey plant that mice and rats who were subjected to skull surgeries, burn experiments, spinal surgeries, and other horrors rarely received post-procedural pain relief. Imagine someone drilling open your skull to expose your brain but not giving you so much every bit an Advil.
6. More than 93% of experimental cancer drugs failed in the outset phase of human clinical trials later on testing "successfully" on animals.
The survey was based on nearly 4,500 cancer drugs developed between 2003 and 2011. Artificially inducing a status in a good for you individual of a dissimilar species who is confined and isolated in stressful, unnatural conditions and so applying the results to naturally occurring diseases in humans is not simply unethical but too ridiculous. Even fauna experimenters acknowledge that the extreme distress that these animals endure jeopardizes the results.
We've been handicapped by the fact that we have been studying diseases in animals that don't actually be in animals. Mice … don't get schizophrenia. They don't get Alzheimer'due south affliction.
—Dr. Christer Nordstedt, Eli Lilly'south vice president of neuroscience research
7. The chemicals that crusade cancer in rats simply cause it in mice 46% of the time.
If extrapolating from rats to mice is so unreliable, imagine the inefficiency of applying results from mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys to humans. Richard Klausner, old head of the National Cancer Institute, said, "The history of cancer inquiry has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. Nosotros have cured mice of cancer for decades and it but didn't work in humans."
eight. One hundred HIV vaccines have been successful in animate being experiments—100% of them failed to protect humans sufficiently.
One time, an HIV vaccine that was shown to be constructive in monkeys failed in human clinical trials because information technology didn't prevent people from developing AIDS, and some believe that it made them more than susceptible to it. According to a report inThe Contained, i determination was that "testing HIV vaccines on monkeys before they are used on humans, does not in fact work."
Monkeys used for experiments are often housed inside tiny and virtually arid cages for their unabridged lives, deprived of everything that'south natural and of import to them.
9. Every year in the U.Southward., NIH blows near 47% of research funding on animal experimentation.
Approximately 47% of NIH-funded enquiry involves animals, and in 2020, the agency budgeted nearly $42 billion for enquiry and development—that'south $19.six billion spent on animate being experiments. But for what? Do you know of any cures for multiple sclerosis, West Nile virus, or muscular dystrophy? Well, there aren't any. A 2014 review newspaper co-authored by a Yale School of Medicine professor in The BMJ documented the overwhelming failure of experiments on animals to improve human health, concluding that "the public's continuing endorsement and funding of preclinical fauna inquiry seems misplaced."
10. Currently, 52% of U.S. adults oppose the use of animals in scientific enquiry.
A Pew Research Center poll found that the majority of American adults oppose the employ of animals in scientific enquiry, and other surveys advise that the misguided folks who do support information technology only feel that way considering they wrongly believe that information technology's necessary. In an article published in The Journal of the American Medical Clan, researchers found that medical treatments developed for animals rarely translated to humans and warned that "patients and physicians should remain cautious most extrapolating the finding of prominent animal research to the care of human being disease … poor replication of even high-quality animal studies should exist expected."
11. Since 2017, PETA U.S. has had most 150 victories for animals used in experiments.
Our victories include helping engineers develop a new ventilator for COVID-19 patients without animal testing, working with the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration to eliminate fauna tests for wellness marketing claims for foods, persuading Suave to go cruelty-free, and getting pharma giant Bristol Myers Squibb and others to ban near-drowning tests. PETA entities' work to terminate animal experiments—backed by the back up of more than 9 million members and supporters worldwide—is saving countless animals.
*****
In NIH's most recent five-yr plan, the agency stated that "fauna models frequently neglect to provide adept means to mimic illness or predict how drugs volition work in humans, resulting in much wasted fourth dimension and money while patients expect for therapies." Fauna experiments are not a good indicator of drug responses in humans or whatever species other than the one existence exploited. Penicillin is the backbone of human antibiotics, all the same information technology kills guinea pigs! Aspirin kills cats and causes birth defects in rats, mice, guinea pigs, dogs, and monkeys, and morphine, a depressant in humans, stimulates goats, cats, and horses.
All these animal testing statistics can be boiled down to just ane: Animal experiments are speciesist—making them unacceptable 100% of the time. They don't piece of work, and even if they did, they'd nevertheless be unacceptable. Torturing sensitive beings isn't OK, even if someone'south pretending it's for science or medicine—it's equally elementary equally that.
Source: https://www.peta.org/features/animal-experimentation-statistics/
Posted by: robertslethed.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How Many Animals Are Used For Animal Testing Medical"
Post a Comment